Rechercher dans ce blog

chaines Youtube consacrées à l'anglais

  • liste de chaines Youtube consacrées à l'anglais :
  • Oxford Online English
  • daily English Conversation
  • learn English with EnglishClass 101
  • BBC learning English

week 12

rattrapage

week 10 and 11

test de la semaine 9

week 7 and 8

week 5 and 6

text on queen

essay subject

homework week 3

homework week 2

test

La semaine prochaine est votre semaine d'examen. (14 décembre au 17 décembre).

- Vous avez reçu un courriel à ce sujet.

-L'examen aura lieu au moment de votre cours habituel et durera donc 90 minutes.(une heure et demie)

- 5 minutes avant votre cours, je vous enverrai SUR VOTRE BOITE PARIS 2 votre examen format WORD de manière à ce que vous puissiez le modifier et y écrire vos réponses. Vous n'avez donc pas à changer le format du document.

-Vous aurez 90 minutes donc, dès réception du document pour faire votre travail, directement sur le document.

-Notez votre nom et prénom et enregistrez votre travail. Renvoyez-le moi sur ma boite GMAIL: mrsloukam@gmail.com

- vous aurez 5 mn pour renvoyer votre travail (après les 90 minutes).

- Des points seront enlevés si vous dépassez 10 minutes de retard et si vous avez 30 minutes de retard, votre note sera divisée par deux. (rappelez-vous qu'en classe les copies sont ramassées à la fin du cours et que vous n'êtes pas autorisés à continuer à écrire après le temps imparti)

- Je serai à même de répondre à vos questions en direct via zoom (lien habituel de votre cours).

-Il s'agit d'un examen, donc toute absence entraînera un zéro. Seul un certificat médical pourra vous permettre de refaire votre examen (le format sera le même mais pas le test bien sûr) dans le courant de la semaine.

- Je mets les trois diapositives visibles sur le blog sous ce texte pour vous permettre de lire de nouveaux toutes les instructions.

Trois points méthodologiques:

1) pour la compréhension écrite, pas de copier -coller du texte. Répondez aux questions comme nous l'avons fait pendant le semestre. Montrez que vous avez compris en répondant aux questions avec vos mots.

2) Pour l'"essay", j'ai décidé de vous donner une marge de 200 à 300 mots . Vous pourrez choisir entre deux sujets. Ne copiez pas verbatim les phrases de la brochure ou de mes documents car elles ne seront pas prises en compte. C'est un travail d'expression écrite, pas de recopiage.

3) Pour la grammaire, conformément aux instructions de nos coordinateurs, vous aurez un seul exercice portant sur les points de grammaire suivants: mots de liaison, articles, prétérit, present perfect, présent simple et en ing, quantifieurs et la voix passive (voir l'exercice du blog)

Vous pouvez par contre utiliser les phrases « types » qui vous permettront de mieux vous exprimer lors de la rédaction de votre « essay » (voir les diapos ci-dessous).

your exam

comment examen

exam

exercise

language tips

homework 10

arguments

Pro or con arguments ?

1. Being killed by lethal injection or being electrocuted sometimes causes a painful death.

2. Giving a killer the death sentence will stop them - and others - doing it again. It has a deterrent effect.

3. If someone murders someone else, they have given up their human rights, including the one to stay alive themselves.

4. Mistakes are sometimes made in the law - what if someone is killed who is actually innocent?

5. No-one has ever proven with numbers that killing murderers stops other people committing similar crimes.

6. The death penalty goes against our most basic human right - the right to life.

7. The punishment should 'fit the crime' - if you have killed someone, you should be killed too. Retribution: « victims of murders cannot avenge themselves, only the law can and those closest to the victim(s) can do that »

8. The very small chance of executing the wrong person is balanced by the benefits to society of putting off other murderers.

9. Some economic studies have proved that 5 lives are saved by each executions or that 5 to 18 murders are prevented.

10. The slowness of the system does not give rise to effective retributive punishment.

11. The death penalty, both in the U.S. and around the world, is discriminatory and is used disproportionately against the poor, minorities and members of racial, ethnic and religious communities. Since humans are fallible, the risk of executing the innocent can never be eliminated.

12. The threat of execution at some future date is unlikely to enter the minds of those acting under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol, those who are in the grip of fear or rage, those who are panicking while committing another crime (such as a robbery), or those who suffer from mental illness or mental retardation and do not fully understand the gravity of their crime.

13. The death penalty is one of the cornerstones of the American judicial system.

14. “Lifers are expensive. There are more of them than inmates on death row and some of them live the most comfortable lives with the best sources of contraband, while petty criminals live miserably and are preyed upon »

15. Life imprisonment changes and more and more criminals are released on parole. The death penalty would then prevent reoffending.

16.The Bible allows the Death Penalty « an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth » (Exodus 21:23-25)

17. In April 2012, The National Research Council concluded that studies claiming that the death penalty affects murder rates were "fundamentally flawed" because they did not consider the effects of noncapital punishments and used "incomplete or implausible models." A 2009 survey of criminologists revealed that over 88% believed the death penalty was NOT a deterrent to murder.

Which argument is the most convincing to you? And the least convincing?

gun business

arguments for against guns

week 9

homework 8

legal background

new jim crow

manifest 1

manifest 2

manifest 3

week 7

EX B P 60

link words

race et citoyenneté aux E.U

caucasian

legal background immigration

immigration

Université Panthéon Assas mrsloukam@gmail.com

Immigration

-40.5 million foreign-born people are living in the United States. They represent about 14 % of the population.

u The salad bowl concept suggests that the integration of the many different cultures of United States residents combine like a salad. New York City is an example of the "salad bowl". In Canada this concept is more commonly known as the cultural mosaic.

u In the salad bowl model, various American cultures are juxtaposed — like salad ingredients — but do not merge into a single homogeneous culture. Each culture keeps its own distinct qualities.

In the salad bowl model, various American cultures are juxtaposed — like salad ingredients — but do not merge into a single homogeneous culture. Each culture keeps its own distinct qualities.

AGAINST

u Prevents the full integration of immigrant groups into host societies.

u America needs to have a common culture in order to preserve a common "American" identity

u Samuel P. Huntington (Who Are We ?, 2005) : foresaw the destruction of American identity by immigrants and mainly by immigrants from Latin America.

FOR

u Being American is not inherently tied to a single culture, but rather to citizenship and loyalty to the United States. Thus, one does not need to abandon one's own cultural heritage in order to be considered "American". Being an “hyphenated American” is being American. (Cuban American, Chinese American, Mexican American…)

u Amy Chua (Yale University) calls for a coexistence of different race, ethnic groups, and cultures with their own unique forms, like in a salad bowl, rather than requiring them to assimilate into the one created by the dominating majority. (Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance and Why They Fall, 2007)

u The “salad bowl” has always been the first step before gradual integration and acculturation. philosopher Horace Kallen called for “cultural pluralism” and berated “anglo-conformity” right from 1915(!) He advanced the ideal that cultural diversity and national pride were compatible with each other and that ethnic and racial diversity strengthened America

religion in the US

Université Panthéon-Assas mrsloukam@gmail.com

Englishmrsloukam.blogspot.com

RELIGION IN THE UNITED STATES

Some key facts.

89 % of Americans claim to believe in GOD.

75.2% claim to be Christian. (Gallup) , 71% according to the PEW research center. 53.5% of them are Protestant.

Common wisdom has it that (on s’accorde généralement à dire que…) the U.S is one of the most religious-minded of all Western democracies. This widespread belief in God and in faith distiguishes America from other Western countries/ America is an outlier when it comes to religion (to be an outlier : faire figure d’exception)

Given the nature and historical importance of religion in America, the extent to which Americans hold religious beliefs is perhaps not surprising. It is a widely held view that the Puritan religion of many of the early settlers has helped promote the idea that material success is not shameful but a sign of God’s blessing, therefore taking part in shaping the American work ethic (see the video from the blog on Max Weber’s « The Protestant Ethic and the spirit of Capitalism »)

Religion seems to be part and parcel of American culture and history, some would add identity. (to be part and parcel of : être partie intégrante de)

The diversity of religious faiths and denominations is another striking feature of religion in the U.S. Because of the country’s multicultural heritage, many faiths have flourished in the U.S.

Catholics represent the largest single group of believers (23%)

The Mormons represent 2% of the population (about 6 million people). Utah is considered as « The Mormon State. »

The second largest religious community after the Christians are the Jews (1.6- 1.9%)

Then come the Muslims (1.5%), the Buddhists (1%) and the Hindus (0.6%)

There are more than 1,500 known sects or cults in the United States.

1.6% claim to be adamantly atheists (adamantly : catégoriquement)

The non religious/ non-affiliated group now represents 22.8 % of the population and is now the fastest-growing group in the United States.

The fastest-growing major religion is Islam (+ 0.7% in 7 years) before Buddhism (+ 0.4%)

The fastest-growing among the « minor » « non mainstream » religions is Satanism/Witchcraft (!)

Christians.

The Protestants are mainly divided into two main types of « churches » (the mainline or mainstream churches and the evangelical churches) and more than 200 denominations.

The mainline churches : Presbyterian (the Scottish/Northern Irish church), Episcopal (the Anglican church in America), the Lutheran, Congretionalist, the Disciples of Christ, the Baptists and the Methodist church. They have long been deep-rooted (profondément enracinées) in America. Socially speaking, the Presbyterian, Episcopal and Methodist Christians are mainly wealthy and from the elite. They tend to be more liberal in terms of theology and social issues. Their heartland is the East Coast, mainly New England.

The Evangelical denominations on the other hand include numerous denominations. They have been growing since the 1960’s and more importantly since the 1980’s and the apparition of televangelism and megachurches. They castigate the evils of today’s disoriented society (pornography, homosexuality, prostitution, abortion…) . They believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible as the Word of God and therefore defend creationism or « Intelligent design» ,as opposed to the Darwinian theory of evolution. They advocate the return to core moral values and spiritual conversion known as a second, or new birth, hence the adjective « born-again » Christian. Mr George Bush Jr is a born-again Christian for example. He converted to Evangelical Christianity in the 1980s (his family is Methodist except for Jeb Bush who converted to Catholicism when he married his Catholic wife).

Religion and politics.

The First Amendment of the Constitution denies the government any authority in religion and guarantees the free exercise of any religion. The decision was mainly influenced by some pragmatic concerns shared by minority religious groups. They indeed refused the idea of a national religion that would fail to represent them and would eventually lead to religious persecution.

However, the first amendment should not be interpreted as a rejection of religion in public life but rather as a refusal to officially favor any church at the expense of others. (See George Washington’s introduction to the Constitutional Convention : it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will… » - which hardly qualifies for a secularist comment)

Despite a long tradition of officially separating church from state, there are multiple instances of the country’s inclination to mix religion and politics.

-« In God We trust » has been engraved on American currency since 1957.

-Congressional sessions open with the pledge of allegiance » which refers to « a Nation under God »

-During the inauguration ceremony, each American president swears his oath on the Bible although it is not in the Constitution. George Washington ushered in the tradition. (usher in: introduire)

-More often than not, wearing their faith on their sleeves (évoquer ouvertement sa foi) helps politicians build up a successful career. They tend to politicize religion to gain even more votes, especially in the Bible-belt.

-Until 1962, it was common to open school days with a prayer and some Bible reading.

In the two landmark decisions, Engel v. Vitale (1962) and Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), the Supreme Court established what is now the current prohibition on state-sponsored prayer in US schools. Analysis of multiple polls since the 1970s by sociologist Philip Schwadel showed support for school prayer dipped slightly but remains popular with the majority of Americans, with a recent poll showing 65 percent support.

Comments/Discussions :

(overt) religious signs should/shouldn’t be confined to the public sphere. / One should show his/her belief/creed overtly.

Atheists seem to be frowned upon (mal vus) or even shunned (to shun : to refuse or reject socially) on the ground that they lack moral grounding. Or their moral grounding seems void since it is not religious. They are seen as lawless (« sans foi ni loi »). Godliness (la piété) is thus associated with morality.

According to a significant number of polls and surveys, the overwhelming majority of Americans set great store by/ set a high premium on religion and faith in God. Hence their rejection of atheists whom they see as untrustworthy and insensitive even if more and more Americans would be ready to vote for an atheist presidential candidate.

Thomas Paine, one of the Founding Fathers, was an avowed (déclaré)/ overt atheist.

Lincoln was unaffiliated. He did not officially belong to any church or religious group but imbued his speeches with references to God.

3 branches

Université Panthéon-Assas mrsloukam@gmail.com

English -L1, Semester 1. Englishmrsloukam.blogspot.com

The 3 branches of government

The Legislative

Article 1

Congress: Members of the Senate and House of Representatives

The U.S Capitol

1. 100 ……………….and 435 …………………………..

2. …………………………………… is considered as the head of the Senate.

3. The head of the House of Representatives is ……………………………………

4. The most important duty of the legislative branch is:

- To make ………

- To write bills.

- To vote whether or not bills should become laws.

5. It collects and spends money from …………

6. It declares ……….

The Executive

Article 2, section 2,3 and 4

Members: The President, Vice president and …………………………

The White House

The president:

- Signs bills into ……….

- Vetoes or rejects …………

- Appoints (nominates) ……………………..and senior officials.

- Meets with foreign leaders and ……………….. treaties.

- Is the …………………………….. of the U.S armed forces.

- The Cabinet gives advice to the president about important matters.

The Judiciary

Article 3.

Members : …….. Supreme Court Justices.

The Supreme Court

- Serve life-long …………..

- Is the head of the judicial branch and is the ………………. court in the country.

- Its decisions are …………… and no other court can overrule those decisions.

- Decides if laws agree with ………………….

- The Supreme Court can declare laws unconstitutional.

In contrast to the ill-defined powers of the British PM, his are defined in a document: Article II of the US Constitution (signed in 1787) which says that he is “to take care that the laws be faithfully executed” . Yet the powers thus assigned do not sound that impressive.

Washington, elected in 1789, was conscious of his role in shaping the office ("If I may use the expression, I walk on untrodden ground"). Sensitive to public fears of an over-mighty executive, he enshrined many self-limiting customs - an egalitarian term of address ('Mr President'), cabinet meetings and term limits that only later became law. His minimal activism, and that of the next five presidents, reassured the public. Only when the seventh president - Andrew Jackson, a firm believer in a strong presidency - took on both Congress and the Supreme Court in the 1830s, were the constraints on presidential power put to serious test.

As the chief of the Executive, the president of the United States is the head of 2.7 million employees (2 per cent of the US labour force) and commander-in-chief of the mightiest army on earth. At all times he is accompanied by the so-called 'football', a briefcase containing America's nuclear launch codes. He can negotiate treaties, pardon criminals and appoint around 4,000 senior officials (though many require the Senate's consent) including ambassadors, judges, generals and cabinet ministers.

The 3 branches : an invitation to struggle.

The structure of American government is often said to "an invitation to struggle": power is divided between executive and legislature, while authority to interpret the Constitution rests with the Supreme Court.

The president's cabinet, unlike the British PM's, cannot contain sitting members of the legislature; and Potus (« the president of the United States ») can never be sure of a legislative majority.

However, since Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the president has certainly become the largest source of new legislation.

And though he may not vote in Congress, if he doesn't like a bill he can veto it. His veto can only be overridden by a two-thirds majority in the Senate, which has only happened 107 times (4 per cent of attempts) in the history of the US. But then again, he too finds it hard to get his own way. Between 1953 and 1996, only 46 per cent of proposals submitted by presidents were passed into law.

Although the Constitution grants him some leeway to begin a sudden, defensive war, he still in theory depends on Congress to do so [...].

Congress's real power over the White House, however, lies in its control of the purse strings - "the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people", as 'father' of the Constitution James Madison put it. And so it has often proved. In the mid-1990s, the federal government shut down for 28 days when the Republican-controlled Congress refused to approve Bill Clinton's budget.

The House of Representatives, by a simple majority, can vote to impeach a president (i.e. subject him to trial by the Senate) for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". But though three have faced impeachment proceedings - Clinton, Nixon and Andrew Johnson - none has been sacked. Nixon resigned before the House could vote; Clinton survived his trial. Johnson, who succeeded Abraham Lincoln after his assassination, was dubbed 'King Andy' for his resistance to Congress. In 1866, for instance, he vetoed the Civil Rights Bill giving freedom to the slaves. Desperately unpopular (Congress overrode his vetoes 15 times) he survived impeachment by a single vote.

The president's power to nominate judges gives him scope to shape the politics of the court. But it doesn't always work out that way. The Senate can reject appointments; and in any case, once installed, judges are hard to control. George Bush Senior's appointment, David Souter, ended up being one of four justices[1] to side against his son in the Florida recount of 2000.

Most great presidents have become so while acting outside their authority.

Jefferson carried out the Louisiana Purchase (buying the land of 15 states from Napoleon) despite having no constitutional right to spend $23m.

Lincoln suspended the right of habeas corpus during the American civil war.

In the 20th century, President Theodore Roosevelt pioneered the use of Executive Orders, presidential decrees that have the force of law. They have since been used to desegregate the US Army (Truman), ban the use of federal funds for abortion (Reagan) and start an air war in Kosovo (Clinton) [...]

Vietnam, Iraq and the White House

"Congress shall have power to... declare War," reads Article I, section 8 of the Constitution. And so it has done five times in US history. That just leaves about 120 other occasions when the president has sent US troops into battle. Like the UK, the U.S has largely stopped declaring its wars. The president instead asks for an "authorization of force" from Congress, as in the case of the Vietnam war - in which 58,000 Americans and up to four million Vietnamese died; or in the case of the Korean war, no authorization at all. After the Vietnam war, Congress tried to re-assert its authority with the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which would force the president to consult Congress and regularly seek re-authorization for an ongoing conflict. But every president since Richard Nixon (who tried to veto it) has ignored it. The White House was still fighting in Iraq long after a simple authorization to remove Saddam Hussein had been given by Congress and long after Hussein’s death.

(adapted from “how powerful is the US president?” Newsweek.org, 2013)




[1] A justice is a Supreme Court Judge.

political parties

Université Panthéon-Assas mrsloukam@gmail.com

Englishmrsloukam.blogspot.com

Political parties

I) Vocabulary p 47 from your brochure from « right-wing /left-wing»

The Democrats / The DemocratIC party

The Republicans/ The Republican party a.k.a The GOP (Grand Old Party)

-Committed to individual liberties and free enterprise

- Progressive (socially liberal)

- state intervention

-« Big » government

- social welfare provided for by the state

- Raising taxes (for public services, social welfare)

-Committed to individual liberties and free enterprise

- Conservative (socially conservative)

-economically liberal (the party of maximum economic freedom –GOP’s website) /

- Limited/ « small » government

- The private sector (insurance companies) should provide welfare/healthcare protection (individual responsibility and investment)

- Believe in lowering taxes as much as possible.

II) The two-party system.

Even though smaller parties have always existed on the margins, the American political life has long been structured by two major parties : the Democratic party and the Republican party.

History : a split appeared between the framers of the American Constitution. Some like Alexander Hamilton, being in favor of a strong federal government (they became the federalist party, which disappeared in 1812), others, like Thomas Jefferson, argued for more autonomous states. The latter group formed the Democratic-Republicans, which later spilt into two parties.

The westward expansion of the country and the development of agriculture and slavery in the South and of industry in the north, led to diverging trends : the only remaining party spintered (voler en éclat) into the National Republican Party of John Quincy Adams (also called « the Whigs ») and the Democratic-Republican party victorious in 1828 and 1832 with Andrew Jackson. (Andrew Jackson is the first Democratic president).

The Whigs soon disbanded over the issue of slavery (the « Whigs » from the South wanted to maintain slavery, the « Whigs » from the North wanted to abolish it, among them was Abraham Lincoln.)

Meanwhile, a lot of Democrats also left the Democratic party which favored slavery.

All these abolitionists then joined the newly-created « Republican party » (1854). The first Republican president was Abraham Lincoln.

Since the mid-nineteenth century, the two-party system has prevailed.

However, over 50 other parties form the third-party movement (the Green Party, the Constitution party, the socialist party…) but they do not get enough support to win nationwide elections. They mainly run candidates at the local or regional level.

________________________________

To European eyes used to fierce battles between « the right » and « the left”, both parties might not seem to differ much on fundamental ideology . In France , the Democratic party would be considered as a centrist party rather than as a left-wing party.

The Democratic party, the emblem of which is the donkey, advocates civil liberties, equal opportunity and a free enterprise system tempered by limited government intervention.

« Big » Government : The party believes that the government should play a role in alleviating poverty (alleviate : soulager, réduire) and social injustice, even if it means larger federal intervention and progressive taxation to pay for social services.

« Socially liberal » : The party is more inclined to espouse socially liberal attitudes when it comes to ethical debates such as cultural pluralism, access to abortion, secularism, same-sex marriage, stem-cell research (la recherche sur les cellules souches) . They are also known to be closer to the minorities.

Foreign policy : Democrats mostly oppose the doctrine of unilateralism. They believe the US should act in the international arena in concert with other nations.

The environment : They uphold energy independence and do not reject « Global warming ».

The Republican party, whose emblem is the elephant, is also referred to as the GOP. Since its inception (= creation), it has been at the forefront of the fight for individuals’ rights in opposition to a large government.

Socially conservative : They uphold key traditional values or concepts such as faith (Christianity), Family, hard work, individualism, patriotism.

Economically liberal/ « small government » : They support market self-regulation, maximum economic freedom, lower taxes and as little federal intervention as possible. They pride themselves for defending the rights of individuals against too powerful a central government.

Foreign policy : The party’s history shows a tendency for isolationism but since George W. Bush, the neoconservatives have favoured direct, unilateral military intervention .

The environment : They believe prosperity should come first (GOP website). They question or even reject « Global warming » since part of the Republicans claim it has not been scientifically proven.

Interesting fact:

The Democratic Party was first the party of farmers and slave owners (mainly the South). By the end of the 19th century, it became known as “The White Man’s Party”. Everything changed after the Second World War. The Democratic Party started its outreach to minorities, and especially to African Americans.

Conversely, the Republican Party was founded over the issue of slavery and by those who opposed it. Its voting base was in the North. Nowadays, it is mainly in the South and in the Mid-West.

Essay subjects.

language tips

your oral presentation. Tips and guidelines

Impératifs méthodologiques : - Exposé intégralement en anglais.

- Utilisation d’un diaporama (sur le diaporama, des images, quelques mots et dates clés, des titres par exemple). Ne pas y faire figurer le texte de votre exposé ! (vous serez alors tentés de lire ces phrases et votre note sera divisée par deux).

- 1 page de notes (recto uniquement)/ pas de phrases complètes sauf pour les citations (sinon je prends votre fiche de notes)

- 3 à 5 minutes de présentation (je vous demanderai de conclure après 5 mn)

- Présentez vos sources (minimum 4) à la fin ou au début de votre exposé sur votre diaporama. 3 doivent être impérativement des sources anglophones.

- Terminez votre exposé par une question à la classe (question-quiz, question-débat, question-opinion)

- Si vous êtes absent le jour de l’exposé, vous devez justifier votre absence par un certificat médical. Dans ce cas, je vous redonnerai une date d’exposé.

- NOTEZ BIEN LA DATE DE VOTRE EXPOSE !

- Choisissez un sujet qui vous plaît et qui vous permet d’apprendre et de partager vos connaissances. (Vous pouvez choisir votre propre sujet tant que celui-ci a un rapport avec le programme du semestre. Merci de m’en informer)

- Pensez à vos auditeurs ! Tâchez d’être simples et clairs : KISS (Keep It Simple and Straighforward). Parlez suffisamment fort et pas trop vite (entrainez-vous à la maison !)

- Relisez bien toutes ces instructions avant de vous lancer dans la préparation de votre exposé oral.

dimanche 2 février 2014

If, by Rudyard Kipling (1895)


Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire